What's Wrong With Stablecoins? Ripple CTO Emeritus Schwartz Makes Surprising Admission

The man behind XRP and Ripple, David Schwartz, admits early blockchain mistakes and explains why stablecoin payments remain fundamentally broken in 2026.

Gamza Khanzadaev · 15 Sep 2026 · 5 min read

Wire content from U.Today

What’s Wrong With Stablecoins? Ripple CTO Emeritus Schwartz Makes Surprising Admission

News

By
Gamza Khanzadaev

Tue, 15/09/2026 – 8:40

The man behind XRP and Ripple, David Schwartz, admits early blockchain mistakes and explains why stablecoin payments remain fundamentally broken in 2026.

What's Wrong With Stablecoins? Ripple CTO Emeritus Schwartz Makes Surprising Admission

Cover image via U.Today

Disclaimer: The opinions expressed by our writers are their own and do not represent the views of U.Today. The financial and market information provided on U.Today is intended for informational purposes only. U.Today is not liable for any financial losses incurred while trading cryptocurrencies. Conduct your own research by contacting financial experts before making any investment decisions. We believe that all content is accurate as of the date of publication, but certain offers mentioned may no longer be available.

What was the miscalculation?
Schwartz’s idea: letting users decide which dollar is “real”

XRP Ledger’s chief architect and Ripple CTO Emeritus David Schwartz has acknowledged that developers made a fundamental mistake at the dawn of the crypto industry. They misjudged how the world would use the digital dollar.

The result is a hidden interface crisis that still makes stablecoin payments work incorrectly and remain inconvenient for mainstream users.

What was the miscalculation?

“Our thinking at the time was (put into modern terms) every USD stablecoin would use “USD” as its currency code and there was no real need for the ledger to support ticker symbols. Wallets could map issuers and currencies to ticker symbols,” Schwartz recalled.

HOT Stories

XRP, Zcash (ZEC), Bitcoin (BTC) and Ethereum (ETH) Price Analysis for September 15: Market’s Chance to Bounce

Crypto Bill Keeps Facing Attacks From Warren Ahead of Perilous Moment

Developers believed the ledger would not need unique ticker symbols for each coin, and that client wallets would independently determine who issued an asset and how to settle payments.

Schwartz’s idea: letting users decide which dollar is “real”

Schwartz proposes looking at the payment system from a different angle and reforming settlement mechanics by separating asset-display logic into two levels.

“Maybe the right answer is that you need two kinds of tickers, one that’s global and one that’s user-defined,” he noted.

A global ticker defines the nature of the underlying asset, such as the U.S. dollar.
A user-defined ticker is configured individually by the recipient, based on their personal trust in an issuer.

“I am willing to accept RLUSD, USDT, or USDC as USD. Others may define USD differently,” Schwartz concluded. While he is willing to accept the leading dollar tokens interchangeably, another business or user can configure their wallets differently and limit the group of trusted issuers.